Most of the references of land fall into the Old Testament.
From Land (Israel)
“The Lord “cut” an unconditional covenant with Abraham in which he stated, “To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates” ( Gen 15:18 ). The Lord periodically reconfirmed the aspect of the land to Abraham ( Gen 12:7 ; 13:14-17 ; 17:8 ; 24:7 ). The reason the Lord gave this land to the children of Israel was because he was faithful to his covenant to Abraham ( Deut 9:4-5 ), his love for Abraham ( Deut 4:37 ), and his love for Israel ( Deut 7:8 ).
“It was only after the Lord “cut the covenant” with Abraham that he gave a general delineation of the land. He said, “To your descendants I give this land, from the river of Egypt to the great river, the Euphrates” ( Gen 15:18 ).
“A number of laws in the Book of Deuteronomy are rooted in the land: the year of release from debt ( 15:1-11 ), appointing just judges ( 16:18-20 ), selection of a king ( 17:14-20 ), abominations of the nations ( 18:9-14 ), the cities of refuge ( 19:1-13 ), removing landmarks ( 19:14 ), unknown murder ( 21:1-9 ), leaving a hanged man on a tree ( 21:22-23 ), divorce ( 24:1-4 ), and just weights and measurements ( 25:13-16
“The Bible describes the land of Israel at least nineteen times as “a land flowing with milk and honey” ( Lev 26:3-12 ; Numbers 13:23Numbers 13:28 ; 14:7 ; 24:3 ; Deut 6:3 ; 11:9 ; Deuteronomy 26:9 Deuteronomy 26:15; 27:3 ; Deuteronomy 28:2-7 Deuteronomy 28:11-12 ; 31:20 ). The image can denote a lush green land that produces an abundant and fruitful harvest. But this word picture may not be an accurate representation of the term. Isaiah used the phrase “milk and honey” to describe the devastation of the land after the Assyrians conquered it ( Isa 7:21-25 ). This seeming paradox is resolved by considering the perspective of the audience being addressed.
“The idea of plenty and abundance is partially true. When God described the land of Canaan to Moses, he used the term “milk and honey” to imply the bountifulness of the land ( Exodus 3:8 Exodus 3:17 ; 13:5 ; 33:3 ; Lev 20:24 ). When the twelve spies returned from the land of Canaan, they recounted their adventures and characterized the land as “flowing with milk and honey” ( Num 13:27 ; 14:8 ). The spies observed that cattle and goats produced more milk in areas abundant with forage. Thus, an area abundant with vegetation would be considered a land “flowing with milk.” Honey, in the biblical period, was not a cultivated product. It was associated with nonagricultural areas that were covered with wild vegetation. This is demonstrated by the account of Saul swearing his men to an oath when they fought the Philistines ( 1 Sam 14:25-26 ).
“When Israel entered the land of Canaan, the hill country was uninhabited and covered with natural forests and thickets. Joshua commanded the tribe of Joseph to go up to the forest country and clear a place. When they took the wooded area, cut it down, terraced it, and planted trees on the terracing, the Israelites passed from a pastoral society to an agricultural/farming society.
“The entire land was not uninhabited and forested. The Canaanites lived in the valleys and cultivated them ( Joshua 17:16 ). The twelve spies returning from their trip into the land of Canaan carried the bounty of the summer harvestgrapes, pomegranates, and figsfrom the cultivated Valley of Eshkol ( Num 13:23 ).
“Why is this land called the promised land? After all, life was easier in Egypt (barring the oppression of Pharaoh, of course). Every year the Nile River overflowed its banks with rich alluvial soil. The farmers also had a constant supply of water with which to irrigate their fields. Just before the children of Israel entered the land, Moses contrasted the land of Canaan with Egypt. He said, “The land you are entering to take over is not like the land of Egypt, from which you have come, where you planted your seed and irrigated it by foot as in a vegetable garden. But the land you are crossing over to take possession of is a land of mountains and valleys that drinks water rain from heaven” ( Deut 11:10-11 ). The Israelite farmer, living in the land of Israel, had to plow the soil after the early rains loosened the hard soil in the fall and had to depend on the rains throughout the winter months. If it did not rain, drought and famine resulted
“Monson observes that the purpose of the land was to serve as God’s testing ground of faith! The Lord wanted to see if his people, redeemed by his matchless grace and mighty power out of slavery in Egypt, and brought through the wilderness and into the promised land, would worship him and him alone. The tenor of the Hebrew Scriptures seems to indicate that the people of Israel were to be an agrarian society, living in dependence upon the Lord. They were not to be an international mercantile society like the Phoenicians.”
How America Uses Its Land
From Bloomburg July 31, 2018“The 48 contiguous states alone are a 1.9 billion-acre jigsaw puzzle of cities, farms, forests and pastures that Americans use to feed themselves, power their economy and extract value for business and pleasure.
“The U.S. Department of Agriculture divides the U.S. into six major types of land – Pasture, Forest, Cropland, Special Use, Miscelleneous, Vurgan. The data can’t be pinpointed to a city block—each square on the map represents 250,000 acres of land. But piecing the data together state-by-state can give a general sense of how U.S. land is used.
“Gathered together, cropland would take up more than a fifth of the 48 contiguous states. Pasture and rangeland would cover most of the Western U.S., and all of the country’s cities and towns would fit neatly in the Northeast.
“Even though urban areas make up just 3.6 percent of the total size of the 48 contiguous states, four in five Americans live, work and play there. With so much of the U.S. population in urban areas, it’s little surprise that these areas contribute an outsize amount to the economy. The 10 most productive metropolitan areas alone contributed to about 40 percent of U.S. GDP in 2016.
“The U.S. is becoming more urban—at an average rate of about 1 million additional acres a year. That’s the equivalent of adding new urban area the size of Los Angeles, Houston and Phoenix combined. U.S. urban areas have more than quadrupled since 1945.
“The USDA categorizes national parks, wildlife areas, highways, railroads and military bases as special-use areas. And another USDA land classification—miscellaneous—includes cemeteries, golf courses, marshes, deserts and other areas of “low economic value.”
“More than 100 million acres of special-use areas are park and wilderness areas, where most commercial activities, such as logging, mining and grazing, are excluded.
“Agricultural land takes up about a fifth of the country. Yet the actual land area used to grow the food Americans eat is much smaller—only about the size of Indiana, Illinois and half of Iowa combined. More than a third of the entire corn crop is devoted to ethanol production. Most cropland is used for livestock feed, exports or is left idle to let the land recover.
“While the U.S. benefits from an overall agricultural trade surplus, Americans imported 15 percent of their food and beverage products in 2016. More than 30 percent of the fresh fruits and vegetables Americans consume come from other countries, predominantly Mexico and Canada. The amount of U.S. land used to produce citrus fruits alone is larger than Rhode Island.
“More than one-third of U.S. land is used for pasture—by far the largest land-use type in the contiguous 48 states. And nearly 25 percent of that land is administered by the federal government, with most occurring in the West. That land is open to grazing for a fee. There’s a single, major occupant on all this land: cows. Between pastures and cropland used to produce feed, 41 percent of U.S. land in the contiguous states revolves around livestock.
“Forestland is the last major category of land categorized by the USDA. Unprotected forests and timberland constitute a quarter of the contiguous U.S. According to the U.S. Forest Service, timber harvests typically occur on about 11 million acres each year. But because of regrowth, the volume of U.S. timber stock grew by about 1 percent annually from 2007 to 2012. Weyerhaeuser Co. is the largest private owner of timberlands in the U.S. With 12.4 million acres, the company controls 2.3 percent of all commercially available timber, an area nearly the size of West Virginia.”
Local Land use Today – Caroline County
We are no longer a strictly agricultural society as was true in the Bible. That makes the regulation and use of land even more important in Caroline County. There is a Comprehensive Plan for 2030 with a chapter on land which they quote as the heart of the plan. Plans have been developed for specific parts of the county since 2001 including Port Royal.
There is a balance between development and preservation. “Agricultural and forest lands should be preserved and protected, as these lands contribute to the economy of the County, the rural character, and the quality of life” Development should be accommodated in an orderly manner, which takes into consideration physical and environmental constraints, the rural character of the County, and the quality of life of residents; Development should be encouraged at a rate that does not stress the County’s ability to pay for the cost of services generated by development. Such rate should not exceed an average of 3.5% annually
“New development should promote the protection and preservation of open and/or green space within the development by retaining a minimum of 25% open/green space; The County should strive to maintain a 70/30 ratio of residential to nonresidential development based on assessed value of real estate.”
“The demands of growth do not outpace the capacity to provide the necessary services and infrastructure”
Residential growth.They project residential lot supply will be twice the demand through 2020, provided the population increase falls in the middle of the projection. The aim is have to lot supply at two to three times demand.
Industrial land. “In all three scenarios, it would appear that the amount of land that is both planned for, as well as already zoned for industrial development, exceeds the amount of land needed to meet development expectations.”
Commercial. Commercial land uses in the County can be classified in one of three categories: neighborhood, community, or highway service. “Localities must determine for themselves what is appropriate. Based on development trends and projections, there appears to exist an adequate supply of commercially zoned property for neighborhood or community commercial uses.”
Port Royal Land Use – Environmental issues
This is taken from Port Royal Community Plan, adopted 2004.
“After important natural resources are identified and mapped, a threat assessment can be made, whether the lands are in some form of protection, through conservation ownership or easement, or privately owned with only moderate protection afforded them through regulation. Landowners may not be aware of the ecological importance of their lands or programs available to help them protect natural resources. Providing this information to landowners and encouraging their voluntary participation and stewardship may result in more conservation at little or no cost to the County.
“The impact of future growth on the natural environment has become an issue of increasing interest and importance in the Port Royal Community. The effects of population growth and economic development on the natural environment include; clearing of trees, loss of plant and wildlife habitats, loss of valuable wetlands and aquatic habitat, ground water contamination, degradation of surface water in streams and the river, disruption of natural drainage systems, air pollution, increased amounts of runoff, solid waste, and degradation of scenic natural views.
“Environmental deterioration need not be an inevitable consequence of population growth. The development of new homes, businesses, industries, schools, and roads necessary to accommodate future population growth can occur without unduly threatening the natural environment of the Port Royal Community. Using the proper methods and techniques, new development can be designed and built in an environmentally sensitive manner.
“Some landowners may not be interested or financially able to voluntarily restrict the use of their land, but may have an interest in seeing it conserved. The County should develop partnerships with conservation groups such as American Farmland Trust, Chesapeake Bay Foundation, The Conservation Fund, Friends of the Rappahannock, The Nature Conservancy, and The Trust for Public Lands to develop programs and grants that could lead to direct purchase, purchase of conservation easements, and purchase of development rights (PDR) on private lands. Partnerships with government agencies such as the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Natural Resources Conservation Service can also lead to permanent protection of ecologically significant lands.
“One of the major threats to biological diversity is the proliferation of invasive plants into native ecosystems, including Phragmites, Johnson Grass, Japanese Honeysuckle, Autumn Olive, Japanese Stilt Grass, Tree of Heaven, and others. Partnerships, such as the Rappahannock Phragmites Action Committee, have formed map and control these species within the Port Royal Community. The Rappahannock River Valley National Wildlife Refuge started to address invasive species issues on refuge lands in Port Royal, but many threats remain. The County should take advantage of existing partnerships and programs to begin identifying the extent of this threat, educate landowners, and take appropriate control measures as funding permits.
“Once the most environmentally-sensitive lands are identified, loss of these lands through development should be avoided. This can be accomplished through new and existing zoning regulations, landowner education, and encouraging voluntary participation in protection and restoration programs.
“Where development does occur, it is important to protect downstream resources through implementation of storm water management procedures. A new approach, termed “low impact development,” or LID, has been successfully implemented in other nearby localities in Virginia. In partnership with The Friends of the Rappahannock, localities have made low impact development part of their local codes for development projects. The premise, according to the Friends of the Rappahannock Web Site is “to replicate the predevelopment water flow and water quality from a development site.” Implementation of LID technology can protect environmentally-sensitive lands from non-point source pollution, which often costs less than conventional development methods.”
Threats to the Land
There are numerous threats to the land and that which depends on it:1. Deforestation and wildfires.
2. Excessive farming ruining the soil.
3. Biodiversity.
4. Wildlife conservation.
5. Locally – Sand and Gravel mining
Deforestation and wildfires
Forests play a vital role in maintaining the balance of the Earth’s ecosystems. They provide habitat for more than half of all terrestrial species, help filter pollutants out of the air and water, and prevent soil erosion. Rainforests also provide essential hydrological (water-related) services. For example, they tend to result in higher dry season streamflow and river levels, since forests slow down the rate of water or rain run-off, and help it enter into the aquifer. Without a tree cover, the water tends to run off quickly into the streams and rivers, often taking a lot of topsoil with it. Forests also help the regional climate as they cycle water to the interior of a continent. The shrinking of the Amazon Rainforest reduces regional rainfall, which in turn threatens the health of the remaining forest and of the agricultural land in Southern Brazil. This also results in an increased fire risk.
Forests and their soils also play a critical role in the global carbon cycle. The level of CO2 in the atmosphere depends on the distribution or exchange of carbon between different “carbon pools” as part of the carbon cycle. Forests and their soils are major carbon pools, as are oceans, agricultural soils, other vegetation, and wood products: the carbon stored in the woody part of trees and shrubs (known as “biomass”) and soils is about 50% more than that stored in the atmosphere.
Trees continuously exchange CO2 with the atmosphere. The release of CO2 into the air is due both to natural processes (respiration of trees at night and the decomposition of organic matter) and human processes (removal or destruction of trees). Similarly, CO2 is removed from the atmosphere by the action of photosynthesis, which results in carbon being integrated into the organic molecules used by plants, including the woody biomass of trees. Thus forests play a major role in regulating global temperatures by absorbing heat-trapping carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, and storing it in the form of wood and vegetation – a process referred to as “carbon sequestration”.
Unfortunately, the global benefits provided by trees are being threatened by deforestation and forest degradation. ‘Deforestation’ as a shorthand for tree loss.Forest ‘degradation’ happens when the forest gets degraded, for example due to unsustainable logging practices which remove the most valuable species, or artesanal charcoal production in which only a few trees are harvested. The Earth loses more than 18 million acres of forestland every year—an area larger than Ireland—according to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).
Deforestation is a major cause of global warming. When trees are burned, their stored carbon is released back into the atmosphere. As a result, tropical deforestation (including forest degradation) is responsible for about 12-15 percent of total annual global warming emissions according to the most recent estimates released for the climate change meeting in Copenhagen.
The reasons for deforestation are complex – they are a mixture of interacting and interdependent social, economic, political, demographic (or population) and governance factors. The most important factors are clearance for agriculture (including cattle ranching), poor governance (illegal logging, corruption, and ineffective law and order), insecurity of land tenure, the system of international trade, poor planning (e.g.building of major trunk roads in forest areas), and unsustainable logging.
“The tropical deforestation in Asia is driven primarily by the fast-growing demand for timber. In Latin America, by contrast, the growing demand for soybeans and beef is deforesting the Amazon. In Africa, it is mostly the gathering of fuelwood and the clearing of new land for agriculture as existing cropland is degraded and abandoned. Two countries, Indonesia and Brazil, account for more than half of all deforestation.”
Agricultural clearance is overall the most important cause of deforestation – it is estimated to be responsible for up to three quarters of deforestation and degradation. While some of this is for commercial biofuel crops like oil palm and soybean, which grow very well in tropical forest areas, much of it is also due to the basic problem of how to feed a burgeoning world population. Also many of the ‘agents of deforestation’ are among the poorest people in the world, often without land, who are forced to clear forest areas to feed their families.
At the same time, forests that have so far escaped deforestation are now threatened by climate change: In many regions of the world, more trees will die because of increasing insect infestations and forest fires. (More insects are surviving milder winters.) “Wildfires have been on the rise worldwide for half a century. Every decade since the 1950s has seen an increase in major wildfires in the United States and around the world.”
In addition to the environmental devastation, forest fires directly affect the lives of people. In the 2007 wildfires in Southern California, 900,000 people were displaced. “The total area affected by forest fires in the western US has increased by more than a factor of six in the past two decades.”[xxiv]
Tropical rainforests, rich in biodiversity, are suffering from warmer temperatures and less rainfall, both caused by climate change. In the past, rainforests were a sink for CO2. Now with hotter temperatures, their growth is impeded, and some are actually emitting CO2.
If climate change is not mitigated, rainforests will not be able to survive. “If the IPCC’s most severe projection comes true, much of the Amazon rainforest will transform into savannah.
Excessive farming ruining the soil
“Food production is a leading driver of habitat loss, overfishing, and freshwater consumption. Yet the habitat under the most direct pressure from agriculture is also the most ignored: soil. An ecosystem in miniature, soil is full of microscopic canyons, bogs, and even wildlife. These features are vital to food production—but they’re seriously stressed by it, too. Fortunately, when farmers are not planting cash crops like corn and soybeans, a growing number of them are planting “cover crops” to give back to the soil that gives so much.
“These include hairy vetch, clover, or field peas—that are especially good at pulling nitrogen from the air into the ground, to nourish the next round.
“Cover crops are like umbrellas for the soil. When rain hits the bare ground directly, it can displace the soil, causing erosion and runoff. Crops break the rain’s fall and help keep more sediment and nutrients in place—and out of nearby waterways.
“By allowing better water absorption and enriching the soil with nutrients, cover crops have been shown to increase yields of economically important crops such as corn, soybeans, and wheat.
“In addition to improving soil health and cash crop yields, cover crops can add financial value to a farm, especially one with livestock. Letting farm animals eat the cover crops effectively turns plants into protein, and can help reduce spending on feed, fertilizer, and fuel.
“While herbicides help keep weeds at bay, their overuse can come with harmful side effects. Cover crops such as cereal rye are good at suppressing unwanted plants, enabling farmers to better manage their use of these sometimes toxic treatments.
“By keeping roots in the ground, cover crops break up the soil and keep it from getting compacted. Roots hold soil in place and help create space underground that allows the soil to better absorb and store water, all of which comes in handy during floods and droughts alike.”
Biodiversity
From American Museum of Natural History
“The term biodiversity (from “biological diversity”) refers to the variety of life on Earth at all its levels, from genes to ecosystems, and can encompass the evolutionary, ecological, and cultural processes that sustain life. Biodiversity includes not only species we consider rare, threatened, or endangered but also every living thing – from humans to organisms we know little about, such as microbes, fungi, and invertebrates.
“Biodiversity is important to most aspects of our lives. We value biodiversity for many reasons, some utilitarian, some intrinsic. This means we value biodiversity both for what it provides to humans, and for the value it has in its own right. Utilitarian values include the many basic needs humans obtain from biodiversity such as food, fuel, shelter, and medicine. Further, ecosystems provide crucial services such as pollination, seed dispersal, climate regulation, water purification, nutrient cycling, and control of agricultural pests. Biodiversity also holds value for potential benefits not yet recognized, such as new medicines and other possible unknown services. Biodiversity has cultural value to humans as well, for spiritual or religious reasons for instance. The intrinsic value of biodiversity refers to its inherent worth, which is independent of its value to anyone or anything else. This is more of a philosophical concept, which can be thought of as the inalienable right to exist. Finally, the value of biodiversity can also be understood through the lens of the relationships we form and strive for with each other and the rest of nature. We may value biodiversity because of how it shapes who we are, our relationships to each other, and social norms. These relational values are part of peoples’ individual or collective sense of wellbeing, responsibility for, and connection with the environment. The different values placed on biodiversity are important because they can influence the conservation decisions people make every day.
“Over the last century, humans have come to dominate the planet, causing rapid ecosystem change and massive loss of biodiversity across the planet. This has led some people to refer to the time we now live in as the “anthropocene.” While the Earth has always experienced changes and extinctions, today they are occurring at an unprecedented rate. Major direct threats to biodiversity include habitat loss and fragmentation, unsustainable resource use, invasive species, pollution, and global climate change. The underlying causes of biodiversity loss, such as a growing human population and overconsumption are often complex and stem from many interrelated factors.
“The good news is that it is within our power to change our actions to help ensure the survival of species and the health and integrity of ecological systems. By understanding threats to biodiversity, and how they play out in context, we can be best prepared to manage conservation challenges. The conservation efforts of the last decades have made a significant difference in the state of biodiversity today. Over 100,000 protected areas—including national parks, wildlife refuges, game reserves, and marine protected areas, managed both by governments and local communities—provide habitat for wildlife, and help keep deforestation in check.
When protecting habitat is not enough, other types of conservation actions such as restoration, reintroduction, and the control of invasive species, have had positive impacts. And these efforts have been bolstered by continuous efforts to improve environmental policies at local, regional, and global scales. Finally, the lifestyle choices of individuals and communities can have a large effect on their impacts on biodiversity and the environment. While we might not be able to prevent all negative human impacts on biodiversity, with knowledge we can work to change the direction and shape of our effects on the rest of life on Earth.”
To encourage biodiversity along the Rappahannock the Rappahannock River Valley National Wildlife Refuge was established in 1996 to conserve and protect fish and wildlife resources such as the bald eagle, threatened and endangered species, and wetlands. A brochure is here. It currently protects 9,030 acres.
The Port Royal unit is a part of the refuge. It protects critical floodplain habitat on the river’s edge. This 125-acre site is managed as grassland and shrubland habitat for species such as vesper and grasshopper sparrows. A mowed trail provides access to the Rappahannock River, host to year-round concentrations of bald eagles and wintering waterfowl.
Sand and Gravel Mining – Legitimate Business enterprise vs. Threat to the Land
Sand and Gravel at Moss Neck, Caroline County
The Fredericksburg area is one of the state’s largest producers of sand and gravel and granite used in all kinds of products, ranging from concrete and asphalt to driveway stone.
About 70,000 years ago, the ocean covered the region. As the water retreated, it left behind layers of sand and gravel–up to 30 feet thick in some places. The richest deposits tend to follow the contours of rivers. Under fertile farmland in Stafford, King George and Caroline counties, a thick vein of the minerals has been mined for decades.
The principal uses of sand, gravel, and crushed stone are road base, asphalt, and concrete.
Companies strip off the topsoil and scoop up the sand and gravel. Many Northern Virginia buildings and roads were constructed with sand and gravel mined here.
Market demand for construction sand and gravel is driven by the level of construction activity in an area. Sand and gravel operations must produce large quantities of material in order to be profitable because it is a relatively low-margin commodity. Transportation cost largely controls price, therefore most sand and gravel production involves local or regional markets near the point of use because it is not economic to transport the material great distances.
Over 10 years from 2003 to 2014, four sand and gravel operations were approved that involved 1200+ acres.
1. 2003 – 295 acres south of U.S. 17 and 50 acres north of U.S. 17 near New Post owned by the Fulks family. The mining operation requires Industrial 2 zoning and a special-use permit.
2. 2008 – 60 acres across from Snead Farm, Clarks Cut. Snead will reclaim the land when done. In addition to having to have the special exception reviewed within a year of starting, only 30 acres can be mined. Snead will also have a study to protect neighboring wells.
3. 2011 – Black Marsh Farms land zoned 372 acres. Agricultural and rural preservation.
4. 2014 – Moss Neck mining by Cheney industries. 44 of the 1,209 acres to mine for sand and gravel, using 30 acres at a time.
In late 2018, a fifth operation was rejected by the supervisors. This was Fox Spring Farm on 161 acres and was zoned Agriculture Preservation.
The mines brought jobs to the county. Moss Neck projections included 25 jobs in the first 5 years and 49 jobs in years six through 10. Mining was limited to a certain number of acres and the land would be reclaimed.
A concern was simply that mining would disrupt the rural character of the area since much of the land was protected by rural preservation. Special use permits are required since there is no mining allowed by right in the county and it is not part of the comprehensive plan.
Also how productive would the reclaimed be ? Excessive instream sand-and-gravel mining causes the degradation of rivers and is a threat to river banks and nearby structures.
Non-environment issues included the increase of traffic. Revenue projections were questioned by the county.
A summary of the environmental issues:
|
|
| Biodiversity | Impacts on related ecosystems (for example fisheries) |
| Land losses | Both inland and coastal through erosion |
| Hydrological function | Change in water flows, flood regulation and marine currents |
| Water supply | Through lowering of the water table and pollution |
| Infrastructures | Damage to bridges, river embankments and coastal infrastructures |
| Climate | Directly through transport emissions, indirectly through cement production |
| Landscape | Coastal erosion, changes in deltaic structures, quarries, pollution of rivers |
| Extreme events | Decline of protection against extreme events (flood, drought, storm surge |